Learning derivative

Family discussion: Trust, BBT boundary, and child data

Available · published · Bhāva-original

Families can answer, in their own words, whether Bhāva is an official BBT publication and whether the site collects child account data — using only the published FAQs.

Audience
families, sunday school, children, youth · Ages 8+ with a parent or facilitator
Lineage
Canonical Knowledge: is-bhava-official-bbt (published-public-v1)
Type
activity
Downloads
None — read in-page markdown only (no fake PDF)
# Family discussion: Trust, BBT boundary, and child data

> **Status:** Published · Bhāva-original Learning derivative  
> **Primary source:** FAQ `is-bhava-official-bbt` (`kl-q-official-bbt`)  
> **Secondary source:** FAQ `does-bhava-collect-child-data` (`kl-q-child-data`)  
> **Downloads:** none — discuss from this page and the public FAQ links

## Learning objective

Families can answer two trust questions accurately, in their own words, without inventing new policies.

## Who this is for

- Parents and guardians with children ages 8+
- Sunday School helpers running a short trust circle
- Youth who want clear, calm answers about the site

## Materials (real links only)

- `/knowledge/questions/is-bhava-official-bbt`
- `/knowledge/questions/does-bhava-collect-child-data`
- Optional identity guide: `/knowledge/what-is-bhava`

## Activity steps (15–20 minutes)

1. **Open (2 min)** — Ask: “What does ‘official’ mean when a website talks about books or teachings?”
2. **Read FAQ 1 (4 min)** — Read *Is Bhāva an official BBT publication?* together. Pause. Each person finishes: “Bhāva is …”
3. **Read FAQ 2 (4 min)** — Read *Does the site collect child data?* together. Pause. Each person finishes: “About child accounts, Bhāva …”
4. **Pair talk (4 min)** — In pairs, answer both prompts without looking first; then check against the FAQs.
5. **Close (2 min)** — One volunteer restates both answers carefully. Thank everyone for honesty.

## Reflection prompts (original; no invented quotes)

- Why might a family care that Bhāva is independent rather than an official BBT publication?
- What feels safer about notes staying in local browser storage instead of child accounts?

## Facilitator answer cues (embedded; not a scored key)

- **Official BBT?** No — Bhāva is independent; it cites sources carefully and does not claim official BBT publication status.
- **Child data?** Bhāva does not create child accounts; story notes stay in local browser storage; contact uses mailto and does not store submissions on Bhāva servers.

Stay inside those published answers. Do not invent privacy promises or scripture citations.

## Source lineage

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Primary record | `is-bhava-official-bbt` / `kl-q-official-bbt` |
| Secondary record | `does-bhava-collect-child-data` / `kl-q-child-data` |
| Record version | `published-public-v1` |
| Origin | adapted_from_bhava_knowledge |
| Review state | `published` |
| Visibility | `public` |
| Export | `downloadable: false` |

← Learning hub · Knowledge pilot · Suggest a correction